Apply Arri Film Matrix from LogC VFX paper. 709, D65, Linear | Destination: Arri Wide Gamut, D65, Arri LogC.
Curve pulled down in mids to exaggerate The areas circled is what I'm referring toįor this Prophoto RGB workflow this is what I would try out in Lattice: It's as if there would be a slight difference in color spaces but I cannot see how that would be as it's all 709.Įxported LUT in Resolve. I thought it could be as if I was grading in a node after a LUT in Resolve and clipping but no, as in LR it appears to work as if grading before the LUT.ĭifferent gamut clip and extend options in the camera raw dialog when making the profile. I've checked if everything is correct in Resolve and the exported LUT is not broken on step one but they are 1-1 with the native result from the nodes. While this is mostly not perceivable on IRL footage it is not right. However, on a test image it is creating banding/harsh gradations in the colors. Open in Lightroom and the profile is there.This translates the LUT to a file that Lightroom can use. Use the new LUT in Adobe camera raw to create a profile that can be applied to raw images in Lightroom.I do this in attempt to remove the contrast curve from the LUT in order for it to work natively with 709 gamma in LR and be able to control the contrast aspect separately. in Resolve, a CST node taking 709 gamma to cineon for 2383 input in 2nd node.However, the second part of this process is essentially breaking the LUT. Sounds pretty simple and given a few tutorials on YouTube there is a workflow for doing so. What I'm attempting to accomplish is a translation of the 2383 LUT in Resolve for use in Lightroom as a base for a look. Quite uncommon for me to ask on a forum but I'm stumped.
0 kommentar(er)
